Case studies / Relocation Agent Network

Relocation Agent Network Q&A Series - Q4 What attracted you to RAN?

Malcolm Prescott, Director, Webbers

Webbers evaluated multiple network options and needed a compelling differentiator that justified committing to RAN over alternatives available in the market.

In this Q4 instalment of the RAN Q&A Series, Malcolm Prescott of Webbers explains the reasoning behind his firm's decision to join the Relocation Agent Network. Malcolm describes a considered evaluation of network options in which RAN stood out because of the calibre of agents already within the membership. For a quality-focused firm like Webbers, the peer group matters: Malcolm explains that network association is a two-way signal, and that being surrounded by high-quality independent agents was a key indicator that RAN would add rather than dilute Webbers' reputation. His account reflects a rigorous decision-making approach and provides prospective members with an honest account of what tipped the balance in RAN's favour.

Key points

We'd looked at various network options over the years, but RAN stood apart because of the quality of agents already in the network. You're only as good as the people you're associated with, and when we saw the calibre of firms that were RAN members, the decision became much clearer. We knew we'd be in the right company.

Malcolm Prescott, Director, Webbers

Video

Relocation Agent Network Q&A Series - Q4 What attracted you to RAN?

Relocation Agent Network on Kerfuffle: reviews from UK estate agents